There is no doubt that group facilitation and collective intelligence techniques are highly beneficial to project management. These approaches offer several advantages. Firstly, they actively engage team members in the planning and decision-making processes, fostering commitment and motivation. Secondly, they leverage the diversity of viewpoints and experiences among contributors, generating innovative ideas and solutions tailored to project needs. Finally, they enhance communication and collaboration among project participants, strengthening group cohesion and solidarity.
While it might seem the project’s objectives are achieved, the team thrives, and everyone is happy, end of story.
End of story? There’s more to explore. Let’s delve deeper, if you agree.
In some corporate cultures, these tools are either absent or underutilized. How can they be introduced?
Sometimes, a work session can become unproductive and fail to meet its objectives. How can this be avoided?
With an abundance of ready-to-use “workshop sheets” on your employer’s “tools and methods” platform, selecting the right one can be overwhelming. How should you choose?
We propose to address these questions (and many others) by examining how to prepare and run a workshop. Finally, we’ll explore a selection of possible tools, ranging from the most classic to the most surprising, depending on the objective.
As a preliminary step in workshop preparation, it is crucial to define the objective. Is it to co-construct the project charter? Build the team? Plan the work? Identify risks? Improve a process? Build consensus? Achieve convergence? Create buy-in? Solve a problem?
The choice of objective significantly influences all other considerations. Without taking the time to define it, you risk choosing tools or participants that do not meet the actual need, potentially necessitating last-minute changes.
As the fine-tuning of objectives and tools is covered in the final part of this article, we’ll set it aside for now. Let’s just point out that the tools or animation techniques studied here don’t require any resources other than a facilitator, a big wall, markers and post-its.
The second essential point is participation. A few general rules emerge:
Other rules related to choice of invitees are more specific:
The choice of workshop venue depends on the number of participants and their ability to meet physically in the same place at the same time. It is strongly constrained by logistical considerations. For large-scale events (seminars, SAFe PI planning, etc.), securing the venue well in several weeks or even months advance is highly recommended.
Given the value of participants’ time, the session agenda must be meticulously planned. Here are a few recommendations:
A final point not to be neglected is the arrangement of the materials needed for the event. Preparation of necessary materials, primarily large-format posters, is also crucial. These fall into two categories:
These materials, continuously visible to participants, facilitate exchanges by acting as reminders of past discussions.
A workshop, seminar, or agile ceremony cannot be improvised. As with any event, time invested in preparation is time well spent. Preparation also secures the event from an emotional point of view, since taking place “without a net” can generate nervousness or anxiety in facilitators and participants.
Depending on the workshop’s scope, a few preparatory meetings with a small team, including the customer/sponsor, the facilitator, and one or two stakeholders, are necessary.
For a workshop to deliver expected value, participants need strong interaction. The facilitator’s first task is to create a secure environment for everyone to express themselves. This is achieved through the triptych of space, time, and rules, enabling participants to evolve and propose ideas without fear of judgment.
Establishing ground rules with participants at the session’s start is essential. Here are few examples:
These rules can evolve as the situation demands.
At this stage, however reassuring, our triptych lacks a little warmth. Participants are informed of what is expected of them, what they can and cannot do. But do they form a community? Not yet. The introduction to the session is therefore preceded or followed by an inclusion activity, otherwise known as icebreaker. While the number of variations on this exercise is virtually infinite, the intention is common: to lower tensions, apprehensions and connect with others. Here are a few examples:
We’re now into the exercise. Depending on the tools chosen, we’ll have to create ideas, combine them, improve them, clarify them, estimate them, prioritize them – and often do all that at once!
This is the perilous moment when the moderator deploys his or her talent as a facilitator. Here are a few best practices we’d like to share with you, as compasses to guide the action:
At that price, and only at that price, can a common vision be built, transcending the experiences and fears of each one. Because what I see as complexity is not complexity for another participant and on the contrary, someone else can put on the table a complexity that I had not thought of.
A final point to bear in mind, it’s essential that the group endorses the outcome of the workshop.
To achieve this, the facilitator will welcome all ideas during the divergence phase of the workshop, and then help reformulate and prioritize them during the convergence phase, so that the whole team assumes responsibility for the result. Ideas judged not to have priority or to be too far removed from the question will be kept and mentioned in the minutes, thus ensuring the transparency of the exercise and recognition of contributions.
At the end of the workshop, it’s time to acknowledge the work accomplished and explain its future use. Two scenarios may arise:
The possibility of abandoning some of the reflections induces an obvious risk of frustration on the part of contributors. The facilitator or the informed sponsor will therefore apply the principle of maximum clarity on this point from the beginning of the process.
It’s impossible to continue this article without mentioning tools. Below, we list two tools for each objective, as a starting point to be enriched by your research.
Defining a Desired End State
Improving the Product
Framing the Project
Generate Ideas
Prioritize/Estimate
Improve a Process
Fostering Ownership and Buy-In
Building Consensus
Anticipating Risks
Solving a Problem
Here are some final tips drawn from the field experience of our eocen and IPMC consultants, who apply them daily in a wide variety of environments – project, program, SAFe organization or corporate executive committee:
Now you’re ready for the adventure. We wish you every success with your workshop and hope to see you soon on your current project or the one to come!